Örebro universitet, Medicinsk fakultet.
Background: Despite a plethora of research, there are serious limitations in our
knowledge of outcome in eating disorders. Almost all studies have been compromi-
sed by the problem of treatment dropout or non-participation in follow-ups. There
exists a lack of consensus in definitions of outcome and choice of outcome measures,
and there is a dearth of studies focusing on how patients subjectively perceive reco-
very. The overall aim of this thesis was to address problems in measuring outcome
after treatment for eating disorders, with an emphasis on methodological issues.
Specific areas of investigation included non-participation in long-term follow-ups,
the role of self-image in treatment dropout, outcome among patients who drop out,
patients’ subjective perspectives of recovery, and the impact of different methods
of measuring outcome.
Method: Four quantitative studies (I, II, III and V) were conducted within the frame-
work of a large Swedish multi-centre study of eating disorders, which adopted a pro-
spective, longitudinal and naturalistic design. Study IV was a qualitative investigation
encompassing interviews with former ex-patients who were considered recovered.
Results: Study I suggested that the reasons for non-participation in research were
mainly patient related (69%). Those declining further participation in follow-ups
were reported significantly lower levels of obsession-compulsion and anxiety, while
those not traceable reported significantly higher levels of hostility at admission. Study
II suggested that patients who dropped out from treatment initially presented with
less negative self-image and fewer psychological problems compared to those who
remained in treatment. Low levels of self-blame discriminated dropouts from com-
pleters and remainers, and significantly predicted treatment dropout. Study III found
no significant differences between dropouts and completers at follow-up, with the
exception that dropouts were more dissatisfied with treatment. However, patterns of
treatment response revealed that those who completed treatment made significantly
greater changes in terms of reduced eating disorder symptoms, fewer psychological
problems and a more positive self-image compared to dropouts. Study IV found
that patients who had recovered from an eating disorder tended to describe other
dimensions of outcome than those usually reported in follow-ups. Patients tended
to view recovery in terms of being able to relate in a relaxed and accepting manner
to food, their bodies, themselves as individuals, and their social environment. Some
perceived recovery in terms of coping better with emotions, while others experienced
themselves as healthier than people generally regarding food and weight. Study V
applied some of the most frequently used outcome measures for eating disorders
and found marked variations in the number of patients who could be considered in
remission. Overall remission rates varied from 24.3% to 77.8%, depending on the
outcome measure used.
Discussion: The results suggest that non-participation and dropout are not unitary
phenomena. There is also a need for greater consensus on how eating disorder out-
come should be measured. This is necessary in order to make comparisons between
different outcome studies meaningful, and to elucidate the overall picture of eating
disorders outcome.
Läs mer & ladda ner avhandlingen här